I dunno about all this. Something's not right.

As of now, It would be Illegal for John Effin Kerry to be replaced by anyone other than himself for the nomination unless they pulled another Torricelli, which was illegal then and would certainly NOT be allowed on a National scale.

That's the only reinforcement I have though. As I said, the Torricelli thing was illegal, BUT IT STILL HAPPENED!

The way John Forbes Kerry's Numbers are sinking, and the way the issues are shaping up, it's more and more departing from a two man race to a one man race (and it looks like Kerry's not going to be the man either).

But the way the left is getting more, and more, and MORE shrill is starting to scare me in and of itself. At first, seeing something like JFK getting switched with Hillary was seen as ludicrous by myself...

...but I'm not liking the trends that I'm seeing on the left. If worst goes to worst, the near catastrophe of the 2000 elections could be dwarfed by the absolute Chaos of the 2004 elections.

Actually, even though Kerry has the votes for the nomination there's no reason the delegates at the convention couldn't switch their votes. This guy is a horrible candidate (his only asset is his service in Vietnam over 35 years ago) and will be replaced.

What we need to know is if the candidates are leagally bound to endorse Kerry or not. Still looking.

Don't worry about Hillary, there are not enought feminists in America to elect her.

Message for Charles Hammond Jr

Are you related to Charles Hammond - the US diplomat who served in London in 50s/60s?