The treasonous Congressman, Jim McDermott, says that President Bush waited to capture Saddam at the right political moment. Here's what the traitor said:
"I've been surprised they waited, but then I thought, well, politically, it probably doesn't make much sense to find him just yet"
You may ask why I call him a traitor? Here's your answer:
Taken in the fall of 2002 as we were gearing up to attack Iraq. Why do the people of Washington elect this guy?
Posted by Tim at December 16, 2003 06:05 PMit's outrageous that mcdermott would support someone who we declared war against. oh wait...
Posted by: Brian at December 26, 2003 08:24 PMI wonder what would've happened if Bush Sr had spoken up against Saddam in the late 80s when he was committing his genocide against the Kurds. The "appeasing" Democrats in Congress tried to pass sanctions against Iraq but the Bush (I) administration fought it tooth and nail because he was their ally. Therefore, I'm sure you'd concur, Bush Sr = traitor.
Posted by: Brian at December 26, 2003 08:39 PMWe were not at any point of declaring war against Iraq. This is a reach in comparisons and a reach to go way back in history to a completely different world than we have now.
Posted by: trogers at December 29, 2003 09:39 PM
